Saturday, March 30, 2013

वानर सेना के साथ श्री राम का लंका से युद्ध निर्णय उचित था पर भय-रहित नहीं

उस समय विज्ञान का विकास आज के युग से ज्यादा था, ऐसे मैं समझने वाली बात है की रावण की सेना आधुनिक अस्त्र-शास्त्र का प्रयोग कर रही थी, तो वोह पत्थर फेकने वाली वानर सेना या बंदरों की सेना से नहीं हारी |
इस विषय पर अनेक जिज्ञासुओं के प्रश्न आ रहे हैं, और सबसे पहले तो वे इस बात से सहमत नहीं हैं कि श्री राम के पास विकल्प था, अयोध्या से सेना बुलाने का| वनवास मिलने के बाद श्री राम अयोध्या से सेना कैसे मंगा सकते थे? 

अनेक बार जवाब देने के बाद भी वे संतुष्ट नहीं हैं, और कारण है की अब तक उन्हें यही बताया गया है कि वनवास के कारण राम के पास अयोध्या से सेना मंगाने का कोइ विकल्प नहीं था| इसका निर्णय तो आप स्वंम भी कर सकते हैं; यदि श्री राम की चरण-पादुका अयोध्या के सिंघासन पर विराजमान थी, और भरत यह स्पष्ट कर के गए थे की वे राजा राम का, उनकी १४ वर्ष की अनुपस्थिति मैं राज्य संभालेंगे, तथा माता सीता को वनवास मिला नहीं था, तो अयोध्या राज्य का उत्तरदायित्व सीता अपहरण पश्च्यात क्या था? 

समस्या यह है की कुछ अज्ञानी गुरुजानो ने यह यह प्रचार कर रखा है कि वनवास पश्च्यात श्री राम के पास अयोध्या से सेना बुलाने का कोइ विकल्प नहीं था| कुछ यह भी कहते हैं कि तुलसीदास जी ने इस विषय पर कोइ मत नहीं रखा| तुलसीदास जी सिद्ध पुरुष थे, और मानस की रचना उन्होंने पूरे भक्तिभाव से हिंदू समाज की रक्षा के लिए करी थी| यही कारण है की मानस आज अत्यंत लोकप्रिये है| परन्तु आज हम रामायण को इतिहास के परिपेक्ष मैं समझने का प्रयास कर रहे हैं,क्यूँकी आज हमें त्रेता युग से सम्बंधित ज्ञान, विज्ञान की आवश्यकता है| यह हमारी ज़रूरत है|

इससे पहले की कुछ पोस्ट मैं इस बात का उल्लेख है, इसीलिये यह विषय पर पाठक जिज्ञासा व्यक्त कर रहे हैं| समझना यह है की उस समय विमान भी थे और विज्ञान का विकास आज के युग से ज्यादा था, ऐसे मैं सबसे पहले तो यह समझने वाली बात है की रावण की सेना आधुनिक अस्त्र-शास्त्र का प्रयोग कर रही थी, तो वोह पत्थर फेकने वाली वानर सेना या बंदरों की सेना से नहीं हारी| इस नकारात्मक सोच को तो आपको तुरंत निकालना होगा, चुकी यह सोच आपको रामायण को इतिहास ना समझने के लिए विवश कर रही है| और आज के सूचना युग मैं यदि रामायण को आप इतिहास की तरह नहीं समझेंगे, तो हिंदू समाज के पास जो प्राचीन ज्ञान(ज्ञान की बात हो रही है, धर्म की नहीं) हमें धरोहर के रूप मैं मिला है, और जो हमें विश्व का नेतृत्व की और ले जा सकता है, उसे हम खुद ही ठुकरा देंगे, जो की मालूम नहीं हमारे धर्म गुरु क्यूँ चाह रहे हैं; अज्ञानता या और कोइ कारण जो बताया नहीं जा रहा है|
एक तरफ से आधुनिक हथियार का प्रयोग, तो दूसरी और की सेना की क्षमता भी उसीके अनुकूल होनी चाहिए, चुकी दाव पर लगी थी श्री राम, और अयोध्या की प्रथिष्ठा|
अब प्रश्न यह है की क्या मानव की नई प्रजाती वानर, जो की जंगलों मैं स्वाभाविक रूप से विकसित होई है, के पास आधुनिक अस्त्र-शास्त्रों से सुसज्जित रावण सेना से युद्ध करने का कार्य कौशल था? इस प्रश्न के उत्तर पर ही आप निर्णय ले सकते हैं कि श्री रामका निर्णय उचित था, अथवा नहीं| और यहीं से आप एक विवाद मैं घिर जाते हैं, क्यूँकी आपके धर्म गुरु तो यह बता नहीं रहे, जो यहाँ बताया जा रहा है, की श्री राम ने वनवास के दौरान वानरों को सैन्य प्रशिक्षण दिया था, विकसित समाज मैं रहने के नियमों से भी वानर को अवगत कराया था; पढ़ें: वनवास के दौरान राम ने वानरों को नागरिक और सैन्य प्रशिक्षण दिया 
जी हाँ क्यूँकी वानर सेना युद्ध के लिए सक्षम थी, इसलिए श्री राम ने वानर सेना को चुना| जब आप इस बात को मान लेते हैं की वानर सेना आधुनिक हथियार के प्रयोग से न केवल अवगत थी, बलिक वोह आधुनिक हथियारों से सुसज्जित हो कर ही रावण से युद्ध करने के लिए मैदान पर उत्तरी थी, तो राम का निर्णय उचित था| और उसका सबसे बड़ा प्रमाण है राम सेतु का एक दिन मैं निर्माण, जो की सैन्य प्रसिक्षण प्राप्त करे हुए आधुनिक अभियंताओं द्वारा ही हो सकता था| 
युद्ध मैं कैसी सेना लड़ने के लिए जानी है, यह सदेव सेना अधिकारी ही तय करते हैं, और यह भी सत्य है की युद्ध मैं विजय केवल एक की होती है, और दूसरा पक्ष हारता है, इसलिए युद्ध मैं सेना का निर्णय सब पहलुओं पर सूक्ष्मता से विचार करके ही लिया जाता है| 
यह भी सत्य है की युद्ध मैं कुछ संभावना हमेशा हार की भी होती है, और उस समय सही निर्णय भी समीक्षा मैं गलत घोषित कर दिए जाते हैं, खासकर जब, जब सेना के संगठन को लेकर सोच समान्य सोच से विपरीत रही हो| 
इस परिपेक्ष मैं श्री राम का यह निर्णय की अयोध्या और मित्र राज्यों की सेना नहीं प्रयोग करी जाएगी, और उसकी जगह वानर सेनाका प्रयोग होगा, जिसकी क्षमता तब तक परखी नहीं गयी थी, अवश्य भय-रहित नहीं था| 
कृप्या यह भी पढ़ें: 

Wednesday, March 27, 2013

UNDERSTAND AGNI PARIKSHA OF SITA THE ADHARM USING PHYSICAL EVIDENCE ONLY

कृप्या शालीनता के मानको मैं बदलाव और हेरफेर करके अग्नि परीक्षा से जो महिलाओं के साथ बर्बरता हो रही थी, उसको समझाने का प्रयास न करें| समाज ऐसे सब स्पस्टीकरण अस्वीकार करता रहा है~~Do not shift standards of decency by explaining away the BARBARISM associated with Agni Pariksha to prove a lady's chastity, character. Public rejects these explanations and Ram bashing continues
We are regularly receiving queries as to how can we ignore the ‘safe keeping’ of Sita by Agni Dev, and subsequent return of Sita by Agni Dev during the so called Agni Pariksha of Sita. Further it is argued that Shri Ram performed Raj Dharm by disowning Sita because of widespread dissatisfaction among the general public of Ayodhya. This, it is pointed out, is unparallel example of respect and honor provided to the wishes of public. I TOTALLY DISAGREE.
The problem here is we are mixing lot of things. The myth associated with history to explain away the scientific development of that time, by providing supernatural and miraculous powers to the characters of Ramayan. We are also shifting our standards of fair play and decency by trying to explain away the BARBARISM associated with Agni Pariksha of a lady to prove her chastity and character. And once we do that, the public by large rejects these explanations and quite correctly too, and Ram bashing continues. The only solution is to accept Ramayan as history and end distortion of physical events. Once this is done Ramayan becomes more simple to understand, and finds its due place of importance in today’s world. The post Agni Pariksha of Sita..Facts accept Ramayan as History.
No, we cannot change our standards of decency, as the public will NOT let you do that, and secondly we do not need that. We are doing a great disservice to Lord Ram and Mata Sita by shifting the standards of decency. We must trust or restore our faith that Shri Ram and Mata Sita were seriously interested in the welfare of humanity, more so of females and weaker sections. In fact their presence as Avatars was to bring required corrections in the human society, so that females and weaker section of society like Vaanars could get a decent and respectable place in the society which was denied till then. 
Remember Shri Ram DID NOT take Avatar to kill Ravan, No that was the emotional story build after providing supernatural powers to characters of Ramayan for the less informed societies like the one we had earlier before independence. Ramayan clearly states that Ravan could be killed by humans and Vaanars, so why should Shri Ram take avatar to kill him? 
The reasons for Shri Ram avatar were as follows
  1. To ensure smooth transition of Vaanars in the main stream of Human Society, by ending stiff resistance of people living in kingdoms, who till now had refused to accept Vaanars as humans.  VAANARS were being treated as animals. 
  2. End serious atrocities on females, and provide them with decent living conditions. Females were forcibly abducted, abused, and then religion would ensure their exploitation by accepting back only those females who could pass the dreadful Agni Pariksha test. Is there not enough evidence in Ramayan to this effect? The only way this exploitation could have ended was by declaring Agni Pariksha as ADHARM. And that was exactly Shri Ram and Mata Sita did. In a FAIR trial in Ayodhya, Sita could not produce any physical evidence that she DID NOT go on her own free will with Ravan. The only evidence she could provide was her passing the dreadful Agni Pariksha test. Because Agni Pariksha had religious sanctity, the evidence was deemed credible and sufficient. Yet Ram REJECTED the result of Agni Pariksha, and declared that only physical evidence could be accepted. Agni Pariksha was DECLARED as ADHARM, but Sita had to suffer, because she had no physical credible evidence to prove that she was abducted. 
  3. To establish Ram Rajya, an equal opportunity rule of law, which were FAIR and JUST to one and all? Such rule of law DO NOT support appeasement by disowning ones wife for the sake of staying in power.
Now, these are the facts which had been distorted by use of supernatural powers assigned to characters of Ramayan.
I would welcome your comments on how today’s Dharmic gurus want us to accept Agni Pariksha and ‘safe keeping’ of Sita supposedly by Agni Dev. I am providing mine:
  1. Shri Ram BLESSED abduction of Sita by asking Agni Dev to keep real Sita, and provide Chaya(shadow) of Sita instead. My comment: No my Ram was NOT a hypocrite.
  2. Shri Ram called Agni dev to take custody of Sita in total privacy, when even Lakshman was not there, but asked for Agni Pariksha in front of entire army to facilitate return of real Sita by fire. My comment: if that was the case, Shri Ram was ensuring exploitation of females, and totally unacceptable, and ridiculous.
  3. Shri Ram disowned Sita because a laundry man (dhobi) was overheard protesting about ‘Sita being accepted back, after staying with Ravan’. My comment: No you could not have had Ram Rajya, a fair and just rule of law, if Sita was not eligible for a FAIR trial. Sita could only have been disowned through a fair trial. Secondly we all know that rule of law requires rumor mongerers to be ignored, and NOT APPEASED. Finally we all know that Ram never personally accepted that Sita could be guilty of any misadventure. He was also NOT hungry for power or position. At least that is what I believe in. Then why did he not abdicate the throne, in case the dissent was large? The fact is Shri Ram and Mata Sita were doing their duty as Avatar to declare Agni Pariksha as Adharm, and for that they both suffered immensely.
Remember history requires and accepts physical facts only, and not emotional statements.

Tuesday, March 26, 2013

WHY IS IT IMPORTANT TO VISIT YOUR SOCIETY TEMPLE REGULARLY?

A good proportion of Hindus do NOT visit temples situated in their vicinity or in their society regularly, but visit some siddh temple almost on regular basis. Siddh means prominent and famous temples 
By regular visit to a temple in one’s vicinity, one means here, that the visit could be daily; weekly. However visit to siddh temples on regular basis is done by most of the devotees on monthly, six monthly or annual basis. There is no problem, none whatsoever, in visits to these siddh temples, as visit to these temples is a matter of faith, but here the question is ‘Why is it important to visit your society temple regularly’?

This question arose because of emails we are getting asking us why was it mentioned that one of the rule of Ram Rajya was regular visit to a temple in one’s vicinity. Read: RAM RAJYA… THE FORGOTTEN DHARM!

Let me reproduce from the above post the detail of Dharm:
“Now, regarding the DHARM of RAMRAJYA: 
“During Ramrajya everyone had the right to worship any Dev or Devi, any stone or imageless God (Nirankaar). Worship was his personal choice. But one has to go, regularly, to the nearest temple situated in his society or Mohalla. In case one was not visiting regularly (regularly means daily, alternate day or weekly, depending on the choice of the person),the temple situated in the society or mohalla, he would not get any benefit of visiting Siddh temples, situated all over India, or, for that matter, any benefit of performing ‘TEERTH’(Pilgrimage). That was part one.  
“The other part, too, was also simple. One had to work, with honest and sincere intent, for the progress of his family, his larger family and the society (one can say mohalla, sector, sub sector, area) in which one was living, and show highest respect and regards to females. 
“AND THAT WAS ALL.”
Yes one can see, it emphasizes regular visit to a temple in one’s vicinity. The reason is simple. 
The Dharm desires that one should work ‘with honest and sincere intent’ for the benefit of the society, or one say mohalla or sub sector. But to do that one needs an interaction point and the temple in ones vicinity is that interaction point. How can one ensure his/her contribution in the progress of a society without proper interaction? 

The progress of the society in which one is living is important Dharm, because this is your gateway to the external world. How can one think of solving much larger problems all around us, if we are immune to the problems in our vicinity? The other thing is that temple happens to be the place of worship, so, the interaction over here would be sincere and positive, and positive actions are required to sort out the problems. 
The important thing is that our problems are ours, but most of these problems for solution need external support, and we do sort out our problems. It is but obvious that our positive action to sort problem of the society would also help us. 
Remember this issue is important, that is why it is part of the Dharm.

Thursday, March 21, 2013

आज़ाद हिंदू समाज को गलत चाबी लगा कर स्वर्ग नहीं नर्क वाले कमरे मैं डाल दिया

राष्ट्र का उद्देश समाज कल्याण है, तथा आजादी के बाद उसपर भरपूर राशी भी वय करी गयी है, परन्तु समाज गरीब होता गया, भ्रष्टाचार बढ़ता गया, तथा धर्मगुरु अत्यंत धनवान होते गए| यह तो सीधा संकेत शोषण का है !
यह पोस्ट आपसब पढिये ज़रूर और अपने विचार भी व्यक्त करें, क्यूँकी विषय गंभीर है| यदी ऐसा हुआ है, तो यह पूरी तरह से धर्म के नाम पर ठगाई होई है, और बिना आप सबके प्रयास के सुधार भी नहीं होना है|

हुआ यह है की जिस तरह से एक नवजात शिशु जन्म के बाद अनेक अवस्था से गुजरता है, तथा जहाँ बचपन मैं उन सब के लिए भावनात्मक तरीका ही अपनाया जाता है, क्यूँकी इतनी कम उम्र मैं भौतिक तथा कम भावनात्मक तरीका उपयुक्त नहीं है, उसी तरह से गुलाम समाज की धर्म परिवर्तन से रक्षा के लिए हिंदू समाज को पूरी तरह से भावनात्मक बना कर रखा गया था, परन्तु आजादी के बाद उसमें बदलाव अनिवार्य था| कुछ उसी तरह से जिस तरह से एक शिशु को जब धीरे धीरे बड़ा होने लगता है, तो भावनात्मक प्रयास को घटा कर कम भावनात्मक कर दिया जाता है, और भौतिक प्रयास बढा दिया जाता है| पढ़ें: मैं और मेरी संतान..चुकी हर व्यक्ति इश्वर का अंश व प्रतिबिम्ब है

परन्तु ऐसा नहीं करा गया, उल्टा भावनात्मक भाग बढ़ा दिया गया है, ताकी समाज का शोषण बिना रोक टोक के हो सके|

जैसा की कहा गया है, आजादी के बाद सबको उम्मीद थी स्वर्ग का द्वार अब हिंदू समाज के लिए हमारे धर्मगुरु खोल देंगे, क्यूँकी अब तो कोइ अवरोध था नहीं, लकिन ऐसा नहीं हुआ| आजादी के बाद , नेताओं को सत्ता के गलियारों मैं भव भवन मिल गए, धर्म गुरु भी उनसे जुड गए, और सत्ता का सुख भोगने लगे, लकिन उसके लिए आवश्यक था की समाज भावनात्मक रहे, और कर्महीन| कर्महीन इसलिए की पहले विदेशी जुल्म करते थे, और सोच यह थी, की वहाँ तक हमारे पहुच नहीं है, लकिन अब तो आपके समाज से उभरा हुआ नेता ज़ुल्म करता है, तो केवल कर्महीन समाज ही उसे सर झुका कर बर्दाश्त कर पायेगा| उसके लिए आवश्यक था की धर्म का भावनात्मक भाग और बढा दिया जाए, और वह कर दिया गया|

सुचना युग मैं इस सत्य को अस्वीकार कैसे करा जा सकता है की जहाँ ‘समाज कल्याण प्रमुख’ उद्देश सरकार का हो, तथा आजादी के बाद उसपर भरपूर राशी भी वय करी गयी हो, समाज गरीब होता जाए, भ्रष्टाचार बढ़ता जाए, तथा धर्म गुरु जिन्होंने उस समाज मैं धर्म प्रचार करा है, वे अत्यंत धनवान होते जाएँ| यह तो सीधा संकेत शोषण का है| 

अब कुछ प्रमुख बदलाव धर्म-प्रचार मैं जो होने थे, और नहीं हुए: 

जैसा की पहले भी अनेक पोस्टों मैं कहा गया है, धर्म का भावनात्मक भाग घटा कर भौतिक भाग बढ़ाना था, जिसका उल्टा करा गया; रहा सहा भौतिक भाग भी खत्म करा जा रहा है| पढ़ें: सनातन धर्म मैं एकही अवतार के भिन् स्वरुप अलग अलग सामाजिक स्थिती मैं, और पढ़ें: सनातन धर्म का अति प्राचीन हो कर भी जीवित रहने का कारण

केन्द्रीय सप्तऋषी समिती का गठन, जो की खास तौर पर साधू संतो, और धर्म प्रचारकों के लिए नियम बनाएँ, और यह भी सुनिश्चित करे, की समाज प्रगति करे| पढ़ें: सनातन धर्म मैं सप्त ऋषि की अवधारणा

जिन शब्दों का जोर शोर से शोषण के लिए प्रयोग हो रहा है, उन सबको परिभाषित करना| उद्धरण; एक साधू को अनेक प्रसंग मैं यह कहा जाता है की वोह धार्मिक और आद्यात्मिक भी है| यह भ्रमित करने वाले शब्द हैं; अरे साधू का अर्थ ही होता है की उसने अपना जीवन विश्व को सुंदर बनाने के लिए अर्पित कर दिया; वोह धार्मिक और आद्यात्मिक तो हो ही गया| सत्य तो यह है की इन शब्दों का प्रयोग सिर्फ सांसारिक व्यक्तियों के लिए ही हो सकता है, लकिन आज इनकी कोइ सही परीभाषा है नहीं शोषणकर्ताओं के पास| सही परिभाषा के लिए पढीये: धार्मिक आद्यात्मिक साधू तथा गुरु की परिभाषा

सनातन धर्म अकेला एक धर्म है जो क्रमागत उन्नति(EVOLUTION) पर विश्वास करता है, अन्य धर्म सर्जन(CREATION) पर| यह धर्म-गुरुजनों को बताना इसलिए जरूरी है, क्यूँकी, बाकी सारे धर्म चुकी सर्जन पर विश्वास रखते हैं, तो विज्ञान का प्रयोग करके यह साबित करने की कोशिश करी जा रही है, की हालाकी बाकी सब वास्तु की प्रगति और विनाश चक्रिये है, लकिन श्रृष्टि का नहीं| चुकी हिंदू समाज के पास प्राचीन इतिहास है जो यह साबित करता है की श्रृष्टि की प्रगति भी चक्रिये है, तो यदि ऐसा नहीं करा तो हिंदू समाज को अद्भुत श्रेष्ठा मिल जायेगी| दूसरा अवतार अर्थहीन हो जाते हैं, यदी हम क्रमागत उन्नति(EVOLUTION) मैं विश्वास नहीं करते होते| यह भी बताना जरूरी है, की सनातन धर्म मैं इश्वर स्वर्ग मैं बैठ कर हस्ताषेप नहीं करते, वोह अवतार लेते हैं| पढ़ें: पृथ्वी का विकास.. सृजन या क्रमागत उन्नति ; यह भी पढ़ें : क्या अवतार के पास अलोकिक और चमत्कारिक शक्ति होती हैं ?

भौतिक, भूगोलिक ज्ञान जो सनातन धर्म का ‘कम सूचना के समय’ अंग बन गया था, उसे विश्वविद्यालय तक पहुचाने के लिए उसे धर्म से अलग करना होगा, तथा सीधा लाभ इसका यह भी होगा की समाज का शोषण कम सूचना वाले धर्म गुरु नहीं कर पायेंगे, और ज्ञान अपनी सही जगह पहुच जाएगा| उद्धरण; युग के स्वरुप के बारे मैं बताया गया है, सारे संकेत भी उपलब्ध हैं की सतयुग सबसे खराब युग था, परन्तु ठीक इसका उल्टा बताया जा रहा है| दूसरा हमारे धर्म गुरु जो की अपने आप को भगवान की तरह पुजवाना चाहते हैं, वोह युग को परिभाषित भी नहीं कर पा रहे हैं| पढ़ें: हिंदू ज्ञान के अनुसार युगों का निर्माण आप कैसे करेंगे

और भी बहुत सारे कारण हो सकते हैं| परन्तु काम तो शुरू करिए, चर्चा तो करिए |

VYAS AGREED TO FATHER SONS FOR KURU DYNASTY ON REQUEST OF BHISHM SATYAWATI

द्वापर युग की महान बाढ़ के पश्च्यात, कन्याओं की विशेष कमी, और असफल गर्भ के कारण विज्ञान ने इस छेत्र मैं असाधारण प्रगति करी| जिसका परिणाम मानव क्लोनिंग, जेनेटिक इंजीनियरिंग, और मानव खेती तक पहुच गया~~After great flood, there was serious shortage of females, and also problems in having successful pregnancy. This paved the way for scientific development in this field, like cloning, human farming
WE have already reported that king Shantanu, married Satyawati, with a specific purpose in mind, that he wanted a normal human issue. And for that he did pay a heavy price by conceding to the demands of Satyawati father. There is an opinion that perhaps Shantanu, being a king, well versed in diplomacy, somehow ensured that such demands are made, so that Bhishm should not become king. 

But this opinion is countered by the established fact that through cloning and genetic engineering, it was ensured that Bhishm would always obey the wishes of his father. However, the behavior pattern obtained through manipulation of genes, were not yet fully tried, and maybe Shantanu, who was convinced that human cloning, and genetic engineering would destroy humanity, was preparing for an alternate arrangement
Information provided to Bhishm, that he would live for a very long period of time, only after marriage of Satyawati with Shantanu was finalized, do provide some credibility that Shantanu perhaps wanted a human to occupy the throne.
The first issue a son was born soon after marriage. Chitrangad died young, killed in a dual with another person whose name was Chitrangad .
History, for some reasons, is silent on inordinate delay between the second son VichitrVeer, and the first son Chitrangad. Maybe the next attempt to have a normal human failed, and subsequently Shantanu resorted to ‘not fully tried’ genetic manipulation of embryo, which resulted in the younger son VichitrVeer, who was poor in health. Whatsoever the reason, the speculation arises because ‘VichitrVeer’ means ‘strange semen’. 
It is also known that Shantanu died soon after the birth of VichitrVeer, and initially Chitrangad, and after his death, VichitrVeer ascended the throne quite young, with Bhishm, and Satyawati ruled on behalf of adolescent VichitrVeer.
As reported VichitrVeer was weak physically and health wise, and with serious shortage of females, it was difficult to find suitable bride for him. Bhishm took upon himself the task of arranging brides for his younger brother. He knew that the king of Kashi had three daughters. While the history says that Bhishm won all the three daughters in swambar, it looks distorted. In the first place, the name Bhishm itself implies that he was famous all over for his vows of celibacy, secondly whether by force or otherwise after he brought all the three daughters, Amba, Ambika, Ambalika, for marriage with his brother VichitrVeer, Amba informed him that she was already in love with prince Salwa, and Bhishm in a gentlemanly approach, allowed her to go. Ambika, Ambalika were married to VichitrVeer. 
One thing is absolutely clear from this incident; Bhishm did not win these ladies in swambar. Swambar, as the very word implies means total freedom to girl to choose her groom. So either the definition of swambar has to be declared wrong, or Bhishm used force or pressure so that king of Kashi acceded to his demands. The force or pressure was such that even princess Amba could not convey that she had already chosen prince Salwa as her husband. On the other hand use of force or pressure clearly indicates that the royal family had had no other alternative. 
Unfortunately the health of VichitrVeer kept on falling and he soon died. Now there was no heir to the throne. Satyawati asked Bhishm to ascend the throne, but Bhishm reminded her of her earlier promises and refused. There was no heir to the throne left. Desperate situations had always made royalties adapt desperate measures. Satyawati asked Bhishm to call her earlier son, Ved Vyas from Mahamuni Parasher. 
She asked Vyas to father sons for heirs of KURU Dynasty, as the situation was desperate. Vyas could not refuse. He was first sent to the bedroom of Ambika, who did not even open her eyes, because of what she could visualize repulsive personality of Vyas, and Vyas could visualize that she would give birth to a blind son. Next time she sent her to the other wife of VichitrVeer, Ambalika, who did not close her eyes but was so afraid that she was just a frightened partner. Vyas could predict that the son would be weak in constitution. Satyawati asked Vyas to visit Ambalika again, and this time Ambalika arranged a maid to take her place, which not only welcomed Vyas but seemed happy and pleased all along. The blind son was Dhritrashtra, the weak one was Pandu, and the maid son was Vidur, who became famous later because of his knowledge.
To understand Mahabharat, the important fact that has to be kept in mind was that during pre Mahabharat period starting from great flood, there was serious shortage of females, and also problems in having successful pregnancy. The advancement in science did provide a solution like manipulation of genes and human cloning, but that solution was not acceptable to a lot of knowledgeable persons in the world, including, King Shantanu. 
The history that we have is of immense value to entire world. It would also place Hindu society in a dominant position in the world. Wake up Hindu Society, you have everything, but you must take charge of it. Please shed your passiveness and move forward.

You may also like to read:

Sunday, March 17, 2013

SERIOUS PREGNANCY PROBLEMS AND SHORTAGE OF FEMALES DURING MAHABHARAT ERA

सम्पूर्ण विश्व ने महाभारत युद्ध के माध्यम से मानव क्लोनिंग के विरुद्ध वक्तव्य दिया, और उसके लिए प्रलय स्वरुप संघार सहा| आज के समाज को दुबारा इस विषय पर विचार भी नहीं करना चाहिए ~~Through Mahabharat war, the world rejected human cloning, and paid heavily for this choice, by almost total destruction. We need not revisit this issue, already decided by much informed human society 
Mahabharat is only 5000 years old. And believe me, once we get out of this mental confusion, that Mahabharat is religious text with doubts thrown in, as to whether it is history; we are not going to make much headway. Secondly, Mahabharat was the first known world war, and the entire world was involved in this war, so the proofs already exist, only thing is that we need to connect them with Mahabharat. 
So let us end one issue; we agree and accept that Mahabharat is history of the era of Lord Krishna, whom Hindus believe, was an incarnation of Lord Vishnu. Once we do that, we will change our mindset, and start evaluating the text, as history, and then we would not be mislead, and arrive at correct results.
This post was necessitated because some of our earlier posts had clearly stated that there was shortage of females during that era, and secondly successful pregnancy was getting difficult. There was objection to this, even Lord Krishna had several wives, and this was pointed out. 
In the first place we are yet to write in detail about Lord Krishna. We have only recently started writing about Mahabharat. But in case the reference is about 16000 odd females freed from the captivity of Jarasangh, the King of Magadh, who was killed in a dual fight with Bhim, then we will briefly elaborate the facts here. 
We shall be brief here as we are yet to write in detail about Lord Krishna. As made out in our earlier posts, genetic engineering and human cloning was prevailing at that time. And when we accept this as historical fact, we could easily understand that those who were supporting genetic engineering and human cloning were progressing faster, because, let us not ignore this; genetic engineering and human cloning is a scientific advancement, which could help in the progress in a short run up. Earlier Kans, till he was killed, now Jarasangh and Shishupal were taking full advantage of this. They were involved in growth and development of genetic engineering and human cloning. Jarasangh was arranging naturally born females, now in acute shortage, for research in this field. And more than 16000 such females were in his captivity. Jarasangh had also captured more that 100 small kingdoms and was planning to execute the arrested kings of these kingdoms in a sacrificial ceremony. So it was strategically an important decision to kill Jarasangh, and he was killed in a duel with Bhim. The 100 odd arrested kings were freed, and they became friend of Indraprastha and Lord Krishna. The freed females had nowhere to go; their families would not accept them. So Lord Krishna assured their decent stay in Dwarika.
There are plenty of proofs in Mahabharat clearly indicating shortage of females. Also enough evidence exist that there was serious pregnancy problems and child rearing in wombs was possible for genetically improved/manipulated embryo only. Kunti’s providing her womb in adolescence, on advice of a saint, for the embryo of Karna, is one such proof. Science was providing two types of human spices; one through human farming, of cloning, one can say the other by developing the embryo of genetically improved humans in a female womb. Some saints would have felt that use of a female womb was closer to humanity than human farming, and Kunti did help a saint in this. The first use of mother’s womb for developing genetically improved embryo was the birth of VichitrVeer, the son of King Shantanu, and it was not a very successful experiment. VichitrVeer was not a healthy person and died young.
I’ll list some of the proof of shortage of females here:
  1. Satyawati was not beautiful, a commoner, and already mother of a son from first marriage, yet King Shantanu wanted to marry her and was prepared to pay HEAVY price for this relation, could only had been possible when there was acute shortage of females. Read: SHANTANU MARRIAGE OF CONVENIENCE WITH SATYAWATI
  2. Bhishm used force to bring the three daughters of Kashi King for marriage of VichitrVeer. Though it had been reported that Bhishm won them in a swambar, but this is wrong, as Amba, one of the daughter told Bhishm that she is already in love with Prince Salva; so that is a misrepresentation of facts. Swambar, as the word suggests, allows female to choose their husband, and we CANNOT temper with the meaning of Swambar. 
  3. Vishvamitra, the humanity friendly saint and Maharishi, performed Tap (concentrated individual effort) along with an Apsara to give birth to a daughter. Please do NOT get confused with the earlier Vishvamitra in Shri Ram era, as humans do not have such long life, NEVER. Vishvamitra was a title, and the faster this is understood and propagated, the better it is for current Society. Read: THE GREAT FLOOD OF DWAPAR YUG AND THERE AFTER
  4. Pandu was forced to abdicate his throne because he could not tolerate a human having unnatural sex with an animal, and he killed that man, and this was a rule his predecessors had made, and he was honest enough to accept his fault and abdicate. As a further punishment he was given medicine so that he could never have any sex with anyone, and if he ever tried to have sex, he would die. This rule was made because of shortage of females for having sex.
  5. All five Pandavs married with one princess, Draupadi, to give a clear message about shortage of females. Further during AGYAATWAAS (to stay unnoticed by even using disguise), Pandavs preferred that Draupadi should pose as wife of five gandharvs, so that she may not be recognized. 
We can go on and on. And as we continue to write about Mahabharat, there would be further proof of the same. However, that was in past. We should be proud that we have with us a history where the world REJECTED human cloning and genetically manipulated humans.

Thursday, March 14, 2013

DHARM YUDH OR MAHABHARAT WAS FOUGHT TO ESTABLISH WHAT DHARM?

यह संसार इसलिए सुखमय है, क्यूँकी ५००० वर्ष पूर्व, श्री कृष्ण ने यह विश्व युद्ध या कहीये महाभारत युद्ध जीत कर यह सुनिश्चित कर दिया की जेनेटिक इंजीनियरिंग और मानव क्लोनिंग, कभी भी मानव प्रजनन का हिस्सा नहीं हो सकती| यह विश्व मानवता के मूल्यों का सम्मान करता है~~The world today is much better, because 5000 years earlier Lord Krishna ensured that genetic engineering, or human cloning would NEVER be used for human production. This world respects human values
WE are receiving lot of queries regarding this. Most of them are regarding our assertion that genetic engineering and human cloning was the reason of Mahabharat war. Some want to know the source which had made us write this post. Others say that what has human cloning or genetic engineering got to do with Dharm? Dharm according to them means victory of good over evil.

Yes Dharm certainly means doing and supporting good causes, more so affecting societies and much more when they are affecting humanity. Genetic engineering and human cloning was affecting the entire humanity. Remember the world today is much better, because 5000 years earlier Lord Krishna ensured that genetic engineering, or cloning would NEVER be used for human farming, of for human production. Today we are not produced in farms, but are a precious gift to our parents, and for this world which respects human values.

Mahabharat was fought as WORLD WAR, with no distinct demarcation, between which side to support; WHY?
This post is in reply to queries received on post GENETIC ENGINEERING,HUMAN CLONING WAS THE REASON OF MAHABHARAT WAR
There was confusion in the mind of lot of rulers as to whom to support only on merit of Dharm. Surely history do tells us that there are always other reasons for taking side in war, and merit is only one such consideration. People were benefiting from human cloning, but humanity was losing, and there was a strong possibility that in not so distant future, if Kauravs had won the battle, humanity, as we know, would have ceased to exist.

So please note, victory of good over evil is just an abstract term without defining what was the Dharm involved. 

The other important issue that is being inquired is the source for saying that ‘genetic engineering and cloning’ were the reasons for WORLD WAR or MAHABHARAT. There is certainly NO DEFINITE source for this, and there cannot be. Mahabharat is coded, as clearly made out in Ganesh-Vyas dialogue, before Maharishi Vyas started writing Mahabharat. Since this blog does not believe in supernatural or miraculous powers, the onus is on readers to decipher the meaning of Ganesh-Vyas Dialogue. Please Read: GANESH JI AGREES TO WRITE MAHABHARAT

But how will you explain, the birth of 101 children of Dhritrashtra from a single egg, kept outside the womb, perhaps in some human production unit? How will you explain the birth of Yudhistir, Bhim, Arjun, etc, with prearranged genetic code for specific characteristic to be imparted to Pandav sons? And how will you explain transfer of womb in the case of Lord Krishna? 

And there can be lot more such questions. No the fact remains that there was at some stage, perhaps immediately after great flood of Dwaaper Yug, that pregnancy, and more so, successful pregnancy was becoming difficult, and even Vishvamitra was forced to perform tap(TAP means concentrated individual effort), to help in this issue. Read: THE GREAT FLOOD OF DWAPAR YUG AND THERE AFTER 

As said earlier, everything is coated with supernatural power, and of course coded, making it difficult to extract the truth. 

But today we are living in an information age. Yes there will be resistance from exploiters of Hindu society, in case such truth becomes part of our Dharmic literature. However all the neutral social experts, around the world, will tell you that this would not only IMMENSELY benefit Hindu Society, but the entire humanity.
So people who support Hindu Society or Humanity, PLEASE SUPPORT THIS.

Tuesday, March 12, 2013

सनातन धर्म मैं सप्त ऋषि की अवधारणा

To oversee the performance of Sanatan Dharm, Sapt Rishi was a centralized committee, which was immortalized and buried~~ सप्तऋषी केन्द्रीय समिती थी; अंदरूनी शोषण के कारण समिती दफनाई जा चुकी है, ताकी बिना नियंत्रण और संतुलन के समाज का शोषण बिना रोक टोक के हो सके, और आजादी के बाद के प्रामाणिक आकडे यह दर्शा भी रहे हैं !
सनातन धर्म मैं सप्त ऋषि के बारे मैं हम सब ने सुना है, कि कैसे उनका यह पवित्र कर्तव्य है कि धर्म को प्रगति की और ले जाएँ| यह भी बताया गया है कि वे अमर हैं तथा वे सफलतापूर्वक अपना कार्य करते रहते हैं| लकिन कोइ यह नहीं बताता की जो धार्मिक पुस्तके नष्ट हो गयी हैं, उनकी भरपाई वे क्यूँ नहीं कर रहे हैं, और कोइ यह भी नहीं बताता की वे वर्तमान धर्म गुरुओं को दिशा निर्देश क्यूँ नहीं दे रहे हैं, ताकी आजादी के बाद, तथा धर्म मैं पूरी श्रद्धा और रुची होने के उपरान्त भी समाज गरीब होता जा रहा है, जात के नाम पर बाटा जा रहा है, और धर्म गुरु अत्यंत धनवान, और शक्तिशाली होते जा रहे हैं|
यह भी हमसब को बार बार बताया गया है कि सत्ययुग, त्रेतायुग और द्वापरयुग मैं समाज के शत्रुओं के पास चमत्कारिक शक्तियां होती थी, जिसके कारण यह सप्त ऋषी प्रभावहीन हो जाते थे, और इश्वर को अवतरित हो कर उन शक्तिशाली बुरे लोगो का नाश करना पड़ता था, परन्तु अभी हाल की १००० वर्ष की गुलामी मैं किसी भी शत्रु के पास चमत्कारिक शक्ति नहीं थी, और जुल्म इतने समाज को झेलने पड़े की वर्णन नहीं करा जा सकता, लकिन न तो सप्त ऋषि नज़र आएं, ना ही इन्होने किसी बुरे व्यक्ति को अपनी शक्ति से, समाज की रक्षा के लिए, श्रापित करा, और ना ही इश्वर अवतरित हुए| कुछ तो गलत बताया जा रहा है|
यह भी बार बार बताया जा रहा है कि सनातन धर्म जब से श्रृष्टि बनी है तभी से चल रहा है, तथा इसलिए सुरक्षित है क्यूँकी इस धर्म की देखरेख सप्त ऋषियों के हाथ मैं है, और वे अमर हैं| इसपर मैं विश्वास करता हूँ, लकिन जो शोषण हेतु बताया गया है, उससे अलग कारण से|
ऋषि का अर्थ क्या होता है? ऋषी संतो/मुनियों को नहीं कहते, लकिन किसी भी विषय मैं स्वामित्व आने के पश्च्यात उसे ऋषी कहा जाने लगता था| ऐसे अपने विषय मैं पंडित या मास्टर्स जब समाज हेतु उस विषय से नए मार्ग शोघ द्वारा प्रस्तुत करते थे तो उन्हें महाऋषी कहा जाने लगता था|वशिष्ट और वाल्मिकी महाऋषि थे और विश्वामित्र , अपने अभूतपूर्ण समाज कार्य के लिए महाऋषि बन गए थे|
वापस मुख विषय पर| सप्त ऋषि वास्तव मैं अमर हैं, इसलिए नहीं की उनकी समय अनुसार मृत्यु नहीं होती, बल्की इस लिए की वो धर्म की केन्द्रिय समिती थी, जो की समाज के विभिन् विषयों के महाऋषि संचालन करते थे, जिसमें कम से कम ७ महाऋषियों के होने का प्राविधान था|वोह मानव समाज के आरम्भ से ही कार्यरत थी, तथा दक्ष प्रजापति के समय मैं भी मौजूद थी| परन्तु बिना उसको दफनाए, या उसको शक्तिहीन करे बिना, समाज को नकारात्मक स्तिथि मैं नहीं लेजाया जा सकता था, जोकी समय समय पर हुआ भी होगा, तथा कभी किसी समय उसे अमरत्व का चोला पहना कर सुला दिया गया|
इसी समस्या को दुसरे दृष्टिकोण से देखते हैं| यह तो हमसब को मालूम है कि सनातन धर्म पृथ्वी पर तब से है, जब से मानव का वास है| कोइ भी धर्म इतनी लंबी अवधी तक तभी जीवित रह सकता है, जब की उसमें :
  1. उचित नियंत्रण और संतुलन हो, 
  2. समाज के लिए उसके उद्देश साफ़ और स्पष्ट हों, तथा विकास के लिए समाज मैं सबको बराबर का अधिकार मिले|
  3. वोह विकास(क्रमागत उन्नति) की प्रक्रिया का सम्मान करता हो; हिंदू विकास(क्रमागत उन्नति) में विश्वास करते हैं और सर्जन में नहीं|
  4. जो धर्म मानवता के साथ ही आरम्भ हुआ हो, उसने अनेक चक्र विकास के देखे होंगें, तथा विकास की प्रगती और संघार से भी परिचित होगा| उस धर्म संचालन मैं यह निश्चित प्रणाली होगी की कैसे कम विकसित समाज मैं धर्म का प्रचार करा जाए, और विकसित समाज मैं कैसे, जो की अलग, अलग होगा| 
  5. ऐसे धर्म मैं यह प्रणाली अवश्य मौजूद रहती है, की जब समाज मैं सूचना, शिक्षा का अभाव होता है, और समाज भी कम विकसित होता है, तो उस समय धर्म प्रचार मैं, भावनात्मक भाग बढ़ा दिया जाता है, और विकसित, शिक्षित समाज मैं भावनात्मक भाग कम करके, कर्म भाग बढ़ा दिया जाता है |
सनातन धर्म मैं यह सब है, और बहुत कुछ| इसीलिये वोह अभी तक जीवित है| परन्तु अंदरूनी शोषण के कारण केन्द्रिय सप्तऋषी समिती दफनाई जा चुकी है, और अमर भी कर दी गयी है, ताकी बिना उचित नियंत्रण और संतुलन के समाज का शोषण बिना रोक टोक के हो सके, और आजादी के बाद के प्रामाणिक आकडे यह दर्शा भी रहे हैं|समाज धर्म गुरुजनों के लालच के कारण दुबारा गुलामी की तरफ बढ़ रहा है|
ध्यान रहे, जो भी मुख्य बिंदु पर ऊपर सुधार हेतु चर्चा होई है, वे तभी कार्यान्वित हो सकते है जब केन्द्रिय सप्तऋषी समिति संगठित हो जायेगी|
इस विषय पर और चर्चा अगली इससे सम्बंधित पोस्ट मैं करेंगे|

कृप्या यह भी पढ़ें:

Sunday, March 10, 2013

VESTED INTERESTS INVOLVED IN DECLINE OF SANATAN DHARM

सनातन धर्म मैं नियंत्रण और संतुलन को विशेष महत्त्व दिया गया था, जिसके लिए सप्त ऋषि समिति थी, और धर्म प्रचारक उपदेश सामग्री मैं बदलाव करके विभिन्न समाज की प्रगति/रक्षा मैं सहायता कर पाते थे~~The important thing in Sanatan Dharm was proper checks and balances by a centralized committee, and changing the content to be preached to different societies in various stages of growth.
THIS is an important issue. Important, not only from information point of view, but also to understand Sanatan Dharm or Hindu religion, as known to people around the world. It also assumes importance because we have history of various Yugs where Sanatan Dharm for various reasons had not performed properly, requiring Lord Vishnu to come as Avatar. 

The present Kalyug era, started about 5000 years earlier, had also seen the downfall of Sanatan Dharm, for which Hindus were CONDITIONED to look for EXTERNAL reasons, whereas the propagators of Sanatan Dharm themselves say that Sanatan Dharm is very strong, society and environment friendly, and very thorough, and that it has always performed, and hence had survived for such a long period.
But they do conveniently forget to tell the most important fact. That survival of Dharm requires its performance, and the only criteria, that can judge the performance is how the society or Samaj following this Dharm has performed. And we know it had not performed properly, during the known period of history, because the society, all along was weak, some would say miserable (barring few periods), females and weaker section exploited. These propagators of Sanatan Dharm invariably give a Sanskrit Shlok, in support of how well it had performed, but they forget that performance has to be judged on physical parameters, and all of these parameters are negative. So what exactly could be the reason for non performance of Sanatan Dharm nowadays as well as in the past?
The first thing that every one of us has to understand, in this information age is that for any religion to survive for such a long period, the important input has to be proper checks and balances, and flexibility of approach in different conditions. There can be no compromise regarding these two vital inputs. But today the Dharmic Guru would talk of everything else, other than these two issues; WHY?
We will first talk of ‘checks and balances’. It is true that Sanatan Dharm had survived for long time, perhaps for millions of years. And the logical question to ask is what were the checks and balances, which ensured performance of religion. No answer would be available from Dharm Gurus. But we know that as when these check and balances eroded, there were problems. Even God had to incarnate as Avatar to correct the path of society. We have already mentioned in our earlier posts that there was a centralized committee to monitor performance, known as Sapt Rishi, which at some time in the past got disbanded. Those need to be restored.
The other important thing is preaching of Dharm at different era. For this the concept of incarnation of God as human was very professionally used to cater to the requirement of societies at different level of growth, education and information. A society which at a particular time was slaving, would be given dose of extreme emotional content of religion, with preachers ensuring that what is being told to the society would communicate extremely powerful God, willing to help the faithful and also eager to answer their prayers. A society not a slave could be given a mix dose of emotional content, with some physical performing content added to it. And a society which is independent and growing will have equal amount of emotional and physical content.
And how the concept of avatars is used for this purpose? Simple; avatars are actual history of real persons who had done serious work successfully to change the course of history by bringing in social reforms by force or persuasions. They have been accepted as avatars, or incarnation of God. And we know that history is always facts plus presentation, catering to the EVER CHANGING needs of the society and powers that rule those societies. So to improve the emotional content, all that history has to do is to increase the powers of characters in that history. They are accorded supernatural powers and this also provides an opportunity to explain away scientific growth during the period of Avatar, which a society in a very early stage of development, with little or no information/education, in any case, would not understand. Such scientific growth is explained as supernatural powers. 
And obviously when the society is growing, getting fruits of development, these supernatural powers can simply be removed to bring in right balance of emotional content and physical content.
Unfortunately that has not happened in independent India, which is witnessing growth, and scientific development. On the contrary the emotional content of the religion has further been increased, ensuring the decline of Hindu Society and exploitation by preachers, which is verifiable. 

Will the Hindu Society wake up now?

You may also like to read:

Thursday, March 7, 2013

क्या लक्ष्मी का अवतरित स्वरुप संघारकारणी का होता है ?

माता लक्ष्मी, सबकुछ दे सकती हैं, लकिन वे केवल उसी पर कृपा करती हैं, जो श्रृष्टि और प्रकृति की प्रगती मैं रुचिकर है| 
आप सब भी इस बात का ध्यान रखियेगा |
यह पोस्ट इसलिए आवश्यक हो गयी कि अनेक जिज्ञासु यह जानना चाहते हैं, कि क्या माता लक्ष्मी जब पृथ्वी पर अवतरित होती हैं, तो उनका स्वरुप संघारकारणी का होता है? 
स्वंम महाऋषि वाल्मिकी ने अद्भुत रामायण मैं सीता को महाकाली का अवतार बताया है| यह भी सत्य है कि तुलसीदास जी ने माता सीता की वंदना इस श्लोक से करी :
उद्भवस्थिति संहारकारिणीं क्लेशहारिणीम्।सर्वश्रेयस्करीं सीतां नतोऽहं रामवल्लभाम्।।
लोगो का प्रश्न यह भी है कि श्री श्री राधा रानी ने श्री कृष्ण से विवाह क्यूँ नहीं करा ? यह भी सत्य है कि कुछ पुस्तकों मैं राधा कृष्ण के विवाह का उल्लेख है लकिन अधिक पुस्तकों मैं, तथा मुख्य पुस्तकों में ऐसा कुछ नहीं है | महाभारत जो अवतरित प्रभु श्री कृष्ण का इतिहास है, उसमें श्री कृष्ण का विवाह रुकमनी और सत्यभामा से हुआ, ऐसा उल्लेख है, लकिन राधा का नाम तक नहीं है | इतनी सूचना अवश्य मिलती है कि बाल-अवस्था मैं गोपाल कृष्ण की प्रिये एक सखी थी, लकिन नाम का खुलासा नहीं है|

इस चर्चा मैं हम यह स्वीकार करके ही आगे बढ़ रहे हैं, कि माता लक्ष्मी की अवतार, श्री श्री राधा का विवाह श्री कृष्ण से नहीं हुआ |

सबसे पहले हमें यह समझना होगा की इश्वर पृथ्वी पर अवतरित क्यूँ होते हैं| अनेक गलत धारणा है इस विषय पर, और हमें उन सबसे बाहर आना होगा| 

इश्वर पृथ्वी पर इसलिए तो अवतरित होते नहीं की उन्हे भक्तो को दर्शन देना है, ना ही इसलिए अवतरित होते हैं, की उन्होंने किसी को आशीर्वाद दिया है| 

नहीं, यह सब अतरिक्त कारण तो हो सकते हैं, लकिन प्रमुख कारण नहीं| 

प्रमुख कारण सदा होता की श्रिष्टी नकारात्मक दिशा मैं जा रही है, विनाश की और अग्रसर है, और इश्वर के पास इसकी दिशा परिवर्तन का और कोइ विकल्प नहीं है|

स्पष्ट है की ऐसे समय मैं अधिकाँश शक्तिशाली लोग दोष मुक्त नहीं होते | 

जहाँ तक श्रृष्टि-पालनकर्ता श्री विष्णु को ऐसे समय मैं हर संभव प्रयास करके(यहाँ तक की समझोते करके) श्रिष्टी को प्रगतिशील बनाना होता है, माता लक्ष्मी के उपर ऐसा कोइ उत्तरदईत्व नहीं है|

माता लक्ष्मी, सत्य है की, सबकुछ दे सकती हैं, लकिन वे केवल उसी पर कृपा करती हैं, जो श्रृष्टि और प्रकृति की प्रगती मैं रुचिकर है| वोह श्री विष्णु की तरह इस विषय पर कोइ समझोता नहीं करती, वोह श्रृष्टि, प्रकृति विरोधी लोगो का संघार करने के लिए भी तैयार हैं| जैसा की ऊपर कहा गया है स्वंम महाऋषि वाल्मिकी ने अद्भुत रामायण मैं सीता को महाकाली का अवतार बताया है|

क्या यह कारण तो नहीं था, माता सीता का अयोध्या त्यागने का? की वे अपनी सुसराल की जनता को दण्डित नहीं करना चाहती थी, और समझोता कर नहीं सकती थी?

मेरे पास से इसका उत्तर आपको नहीं मिलेगा, उत्तर आपको स्वंम खोजना होगा|
लकिन यह भी सत्य है की अयोध्या, जहाँ श्री राम ने जन्म लिया, और जहाँ की महारानी लक्ष्मी अवतार माता सीता थी, वोह आज तक, आर्थिक और अन्य मापदंडो मैं ,आजभी, बहुत पिछड़ा हुआ है| 

मथुरा का और भी बुरा हाल है, और उसका कारण है की श्री कृष्ण के समय मथुरा जेनेटिक इंजीनियरिंग और मानव क्लोनिंग का प्रमुख केंद्र था|

श्री कृष्ण के लिए भी उसकी दिशा परिवर्तन संभव नहीं हो रहा था, इसलिए वे द्वारका चले गए, लकिन श्री श्री राधा जी ने मथुरा छेत्र नहीं छोड़ा|

संभवता अवतरित होने के उनके उत्तरदईत्व श्रृष्टि-पालनकरता से उस जन्म मैं अलग रहने के लिए विवश कर रहे थे| श्रृष्टि विरोधी और प्रकृति विरोधी लोगो को दण्डित करने का उद्देश श्री कृष्ण के साथ रह कर पूरा होता नहीं नज़र आ रहा था|

यह भी समझ लें, की राधा रानी ब्रिजवासनी हैं, और श्री कृष्ण भी | यदि विवाह हुआ होता तो उनको भी अयोध्या की तरह ब्रज छोड़ना पड़ता, और शायद आत्महत्या माता सीता की तरह करनी पड़ती | क्युकी सनातन धर्म ससुराल के संघार की अनुमति तो बहू को देता नहीं है |

स्पष्ट है की महाऋषि वाल्मिकी तो गलत हो नहीं सकते, माता लक्ष्मी के संघारकारणी रूप मैं श्री श्री राधा जी की जो जिम्मेदारियां थी, वे श्री कृष्ण से विवाह करके पूरी नहीं हो सकती थी|

आप सब भी इस बात का ध्यान रखियेगा, की माता लक्ष्मी, उसी पर केवल कृपा करती हैं, जो श्रृष्टि और प्रकृति के विकास मैं रुचिकर हो|
अब एक दुसरे कारण पर भी आते हैं|
सीता का त्याग श्री राम ने इसलिए करा था क्यूंकि माता सीता, यह आरोप लगने के बाद कि वे स्वेच्छा से रावण के साथ गए थी, 
एक भी प्रमाण , अग्नि परीक्षा के अतिरिक्त न्याय पीठ को नहीं दे पाई, 
कि वे स्वेच्छा से रावण के साथ पंचवटी से नहीं गयी थी |

श्री राम और माता सीता दोनों ने आपसी सहमती के बाद ही यह निर्णय लिया होगा कि अग्नि परीक्षा जैसे क्रूर धर्म को अधर्म कैसे घोषित करा जाय |

दोनों ने घोर भावनात्मक कष्ट सहे, परन्तु माता सीता ने घोर भौतिक कष्ट भी सहे; वन में अयोध्या के दो राजकुमारो को जन्म दिया, पाला |

लकिन वोह था त्रेता युग, जिसका सन्देश और धर्म द्वापर युग में पंहुचा |

और द्वापर युग में माँ लक्ष्मी की अवतार श्री श्री राधा रानी यह धर्म नहीं स्थापित करना चाहती थी..भविष्य के लिए ..
कि...
किसी अच्छे काम के लिए, भावनात्मक कष्ट तो दोनों सहे, मर्द और औरत, 
तथा,
भौतिक कष्ट सिर्फ औरत सहे , और यही सूचना वे कलयुग की महिलाओं. पुरुष को देना चाहती थी |
कृप्या यह भी पढ़ें:

Wednesday, March 6, 2013

BRING BACK CENTRALIZED SAPT RISHI COMMITTEE FOR SANATAN DHARM

सनातन धर्म अत्यंत प्राचीन धर्म है, और पहले ऐसी अनेक स्थिति से गुजर चूका है, जब शक्तिशाली लोग ने इसमें हेर फेर करके इसे व्यक्तिगत लाभ के लिए प्रयोग करा है~~Sanatan Dharm is very old and there had been situations in the past, when powerful persons manipulated the Dharm, for their own personal greed and power, and there are several proof of the same in Puraans.
Before understanding exactly what is happening, we must first accept and understand that Sanatan Dharm is actually very old, and was there right from inception of humanity. A Dharm can last for such a long period of time, only when it has enough positive inputs to ensure continuous growth of Society following that Dharm.

While accepting this, we also have to accept and understand that there would have been situations in the past, not once but several times, when powerful persons could manipulate the Dharm, for their own personal greed and power, and there are several proof of the same in Puraans. We shall be providing links towards the end of the post as proof of the same.

However we do not need links to prove the manipulation of Dharm because the incarnation of God, more importantly in human form as Bhagwan Parashuram, Shri Ram and Lord Krishna, establishes conclusively that Dharm do got manipulated by powerful persons.
This post actually is in continuation of the previous post: CONCEPT OF SAPT RISHIS IN SANATAN DHARM 
But first we must understand the modus operandi that is used by Sanatan Dharm to address different societies that would have existed at different times, ages, with little or no information to highly educated and informed ones. Unfortunately the same, in the absence of a Centralized agency is  manipulated to exploit the society, as follows:
  1. By delinking religion from performance of Samaj, following this. This is done when the society is slave or for other extreme reasons, when survival of society is prime or only concern. Rest of the time performance has to be linked.
  2. By preaching wrong version of religion. Ex: A society which is slaving, uneducated and tormented and harassed by external invaders, could only be given emotional dosage of religion. The society may be told that foreign invaders are like Rakshas, and these Rakshas would definitely be wiped off, by Lord Vishnu, who is ever present on this earth in the form of Shri Ram. And while doing so the definition of Avatar (human incarnation of God) would be ignored. Further Avatars, Rakshas and other persons would be loaded with supernatural powers to further increase the faith of the society, in God, and to make them understand that ultimately good prevails, evil is destroyed. This was done when Hindu Society was slave, but why now?
  3. By ignoring or falsifying the definitions of various important words used in Sanatan Dharm. Every important word need to be properly and physically defined. Ex., Dharmic person, Spiritual Person, etc. They also wrongly insist that History of incarnated God, ie, Ramayan and Mahabharat are religious texts. True they were preached more like religious texts when the society was uninformed, uneducated, but why today? Please read for correct definition : MEANING OF WORDS: SANATAN DHARM, DHARMIC, SPIRITUAL, GURU, SAADHU
  4. By providing misleading or false reasons for decline of society, believing in that faith. They keep on saying is that society is becoming Adharmic(irreligious), whereas statistics show that spending on religion has increased tremendously after independence. Another ex: present Hindu society believes in Sanatan Dharm, but the verifiable parameters tell us, it is going down, while the Gurus preaching the faith are becoming richer and powerful. So what does these gurus do to keep their flocks in good humor, and also to increase their numbers? Simple: they tell them that by performing Seva in the Guru’s Ashram, their ticket for heaven is booked. The fact is different. Pooja, rituals, seva performed at temple or Guru’s Ashram motivate one to be Dharmic person, and does not on its own constitute Dharm.
  5. Most important: to ensure performance of religion, Sanatan Dharm has pure religious texts like Vedas and Upanishads, and History of incarnated Gods. To ensure religious texts like Vedas and Upanishads are not misrepresented, history of incarnated God with supernatural powers is told when the society is weak and less informed, and WITHOUT supernatural powers when the society is informed and developing.
  6. Inability to separate knowledge on certain subjects, which naturally becomes part of such an old religion, from actual religion to be preached, and in doing so, these uneducated, uninformed Dharmic gurus, who, having used propaganda, have established themselves, as God, preach at times things which are totally wrong, and damaging to society. Ex: Yugs are something similar to year, except they are much longer, and need physical verifiable definition like year has.
  7. Not in a position to give clear verdict that Hindus accept and follow Evolution and do not believe in Creation.
Perhaps these are some of the important points which need be addressed. But there could be many more. A centralized committee of Sapt Rishi is the only option.

Links, establishing manipulation of Sanatan Dharm at various stages by powerful persons.

Monday, March 4, 2013

CONCEPT OF SAPT RISHIS IN SANATAN DHARM

Sapt Rishi was actually a centralized committee, to ensure and oversee the satisfactory performance of religion. It existed right from inception, from the time of Daksh Prajapati
We all have heard of Sapt Rishis in Sanatan Dharm, and how it is their sacred duty to carry the religion forward. We are also told, repeatedly, that they are IMMORTAL, and they invariably do their work. But then no one tells us why most of the sacred books that had been destroyed by invaders, had not been replenished by these Sapt Rishis, and why, they are not doing their job. 

Needless to say they SHOULD have interacted with the present Dharm Gurus, and had ensured that the society which is following the sacred Sanatan Dharm, progressed and the existing society should not have suffered the rot due to caste system, excessive emotional content of Sanatan Dharm, which is being preached by present Religious Gurus to ensure that the Hindu society keep on suffering while the gurus could reap the benefit of preaching, by way of power, luxury and wealth.

Secondly, as per the content that is being preached to us, one could understand that in Satyayug, Treta Yug, and Dwaaper Yug, the enemies had supernatural powers, which made these Sapt Rishis ineffective, forcing God to incarnate, and bring corrections. But the enemies in this Kalyug, had had NO such supernatural powers, at least in the recent past, when invaders, during the last 1000 years, ruled us, forced the Hindu Society to suffer unimaginable atrocities. Then neither the immortal Sapt Rishis were available with their supernatural gift to curse any one and destroy the offender, nor did God incarnate to help the society. NO SOMETHING IS WRONG.

And finally, we are also told, that one of the important reasons, why Sanatan Dharm had survived from time humans started dwelling on this earth, is because the Dharm is secure in the hand of Sapt Rishis, and they are, as told earlier, IMMORTAL. This I do believe, though not in the EXPLOITABLE way the society is being told about Sapt Rishis by Gurus.

What exactly is the meaning of Rishis? Rishis are not saints. They are experts, rather masters in different field, like medicine, astronomy, economics, military science, other fields, including scientific, civil and social. And Maha Rishis are those who have done some path breaking work using these subjects for the cause of humanity, and environment. Vashist was a Maharishi, so was Valmiki. Vishvamitr, also was a Maharishi for his exceptional work on service of humanity. 

Now back to the subject. As said earlier, I believe that Sapt Rishis are immortal; immortal not because they could surpass the age limit which brings end of others, but because Sapt Rishi was actually a centralized committee, to ensure and oversee the satisfactory performance of religion. It existed right from inception, from the time of Daksh Prajapati. But without its burial or without making it weak, society could never had suffered, so at some stage in the absence of proper rules, or at those stages of society when the education, information and growth was negligible, Sapt Rishis had been immortalized, and had stayed immortalized ever since.

Let us look at it the other way. We all know that Sanatan Dharm existed on earth since inception of humans. A Dharm can only survive for such a long time, when 

a) It has proper checks and balance.

b) Its objective for the society following it is clear and unambiguous; equal opportunity for all section of the society for growth. 

c) It respects the process of evolution. Hindus believe in Evolution and do not believe in Creation.

d) A Dharm which has survived since inception must have seen many cycles of evolution, growth and then destruction. Obviously Dharm preached for less educated, uninformed and less developed society would be different than those preached to developed, informed and educated society.

e) It has in built system to increase the emotional content of religion, when the society is less developed, passing through a difficult period, to ensure peaceful existence of the society during difficult time, and increase the physical content and reduce the emotional content of the religion, when the society is educated, developed and growing.

As things stands, Sanatan Dharm does have these inputs, and perhaps much more. However as said earlier, because of the exploitation, the centralized Sapt Rishi committee had been buried, immortalized, so that without ANY checks and balances, the society can be exploited. No wonder only recently, Hindu Society, had come out of 1000 years of slavery, and our religious Gurus, in their greed, had already planned their slavery again. 

Remember, there is NO way , the points mentioned above, could be implemented, if there was no centralized committee of Sapt Rishi

We shall be discussing much more about these issues in our next post related to this which would be: BRING BACK CENTRALIZED SAPT RISHI COMMITTEE FOR SANATAN DHARM

You may also like to read: 

ABOUT ME:

A Consulting Engineer, operating from Mumbai, involved in financial and project consultancy; also involved in revival of sick establishments.

ABOUT MY BLOG: One has to accept that Hindus, though, highly religious, are not getting desired result as a society. Female feticide, lack of education for girls, dowry deaths, suicides among farmers, increase in court cases among relatives, corruption, mistrust and discontent, are all physical parameters to measure the effectiveness or success/failure of RELIGION, in a society. And all this, despite the fact, that spending on religion, by Hindus, has increased drastically after the advent of multiple TV channels. There is serious problem of attitude of every individual which need to be corrected. Revival of Hindu religion, perhaps, is the only way forward.

I am writing how problems, faced by Indian people can be sorted out by revival of Hindu Religion.