The ratio of emotional content to physical content should also have been changed, post independence drastically, by increasing physical content. Hindu Samaaj has now matured, and cannot and should not be treated as child. But that has NOT happened, as Sanskrit Teachers and Gurus are interested in EXPLOITATION of Hindu Society.
We need to accept and understand more serious social issues in Ramayan, like ‘how AGNI PARIKSHA was declared as adharm’, why is Shri Ram called MARYADA PURUSHOTTAM, and how evolved humans in Ramayan, also known as Vaanars were accorded their due place in human society, by the efforts of Shri Ram and Mata Sita.
We need to accept and understand more serious social issues in Ramayan, like ‘how AGNI PARIKSHA was declared as adharm’, why is Shri Ram called MARYADA PURUSHOTTAM, and how evolved humans in Ramayan, also known as Vaanars were accorded their due place in human society, by the efforts of Shri Ram and Mata Sita.
Some queries are being regularly received regarding the post RAMAYAN IS MORE THAN RAM RAVAN YUDH. Some of the objections are regarding our contention that we want to dilute the importance of Ram-Ravan Yudh?
Yes, according to us Ram-Ravan Yudh, after India became independent, should not have been given the importance that has been accorded to it.”Ram Ravan Yudh was important before independence as Saints would then invariably imply how Rakshas or invaders would be wiped out. But now our priorities should change.
Independent, Hindu Samaaj is mature, and should be told about serious social issues like how AGNI PARIKSHA was declared Adharm and how evolved humans, Vaanars, were accorded due place in human society
Ramayan clearly tells us that Ravan was not invincible. In fact it goes a step further and informs that Ravan would not meet his natural death but would be killed by a human and clarifies that Humans includes Vaanars.”
We have to understand one thing very clearly. The performance of Dharm for a child will always be different from a grown up adult. As said in our Hindi post, मैं और मेरी संतान..चुकी हर व्यक्ति इश्वर का अंश व प्रतिबिम्ब है , a child believes that his father can solve all his problems; he is just like GOD to him, but a grown up adult has more practical relation with his father and mother.
After independence, Hindu Samaaj has also matured, and can not and should not be treated as child. We need to accept and understand more serious social issues in Ramayan, like ‘how AGNI PARIKSHA was declared as adharm’, why is Shri Ram called MARYADA PURUSHOTTAM, and how evolved humans in Ramayan, also known as Vaanars were accorded their due place in human society, by the efforts of Shri Ram and Mata Sita.
You can get all this information from this blog itself.
You may also like to read:
RAMAYAN IS THE WAR OF TWO PERSONALITIES,RAM & RAVAN.CLASH OF EGO OF THEM.
ReplyDeleteIn the first place, it looks strange that persons have to hide their identities, even when commenting on a religious post.
ReplyDeleteThis totally takes away the credibility of the person making the comment....As such, although I do not agree to the content of the comment, I will leave it at that.
yes Draupadi was mother of a hundred sons, but the Pandavas aren't exactly from normal human lineage either. I don't think Mahabharata has much to do with science vs. naturalism, Mahabharata is about truth vs. untruth, virtue vs. debauchery. To suggest otherwise is to dilute Krishna's message.
ReplyDeleteShawn,
ReplyDeleteI have no idea if Draupadi was mother of !00 sons; history tells us Gandhari was mother of 100 sons..
Once we accept that most of the characters were not normal, then the message of Shri Krishn need to be deciphered...