AGNI PARIKSHA OF SITA: DID RAM HAD ANY OPTION OTHER THAN TO DISOWN SITA

Thursday, March 1, 2012

DID RAM HAD ANY OPTION OTHER THAN TO DISOWN SITA

Incarnation of Sita was to provide level playing field to females and Vaanars.We do feel discomfort for the PAIN she had suffered for the sake of Humanity, but this should motivate us to be Karmic.

This question has been asked several times and while asking this people assume that during the Trial of Sita , better arguments could have been presented, by the council of Mata Sita.

Some say that Defense should have strongly stated that Agni Pariksha had religious sanctity and as such for the purpose of this particular case that is the trial of Sita, the existing practice of having successfully undertaken Agni Pariksha test should have been enough, and Sita should not have been disowned.

I would like to remind my friends and well wishers of Sita that WE accept that Mata Sita was an incarnation of Devi Lakshmi. She was on Prithvi for a very specific purpose, and that was to provide level playing field to females and Vaanars. So We as BHAKTS do feel discomfort for the PAIN she had suffered for the sake of Humanity, but this should also motivate us to be Karmic and more conscious of our social obligations.

One must also understand that the realization that the only way Mata Sita could have escaped Disownment was by accepting the result of Agni Pariksha is more PAINFUL, as what we are asking on being emotional is that Shri Ram should have allowed the Draconian rule to exist. That would have DEFEATED the very purpose of Avatar/ Incarnation.

Note: You can read the original post referred to above by clicking on the title or here: AGNI PARIKSHA OF SITA ....FACTS

No comments :

Post a Comment

PLEASE REMEMBER ;

महाभारत, रामायण अवतरित ईश्वर का इतिहास है, तथा किसी भी चरित्र के पास चमत्कारिक या अलोकिक शक्ति नहीं थी |

गणेश-व्यास संवाद यह साफ़ जताता है कि महाभारत कोडित(CODED) है , और उसे आसानी से नहीं समझा जा सकता | एक ही तरीका है उसे समझने का, कि वर्तमान समाज हित को केंद्रबिंदु बना कर समझा जाए |

एक प्रश्न है जिसका स्पष्ट उत्तर आवश्यक है,और वह है कि रामायण इतिहास है या ध्गार्मिक ग्रन्थ ? यदि धार्मिक ग्रन्थ है तो हिंदुओं ने सुप्रीम कोर्ट मैं राम सेतु को ले कर दावा क्यूँ कर रखा है ?

नहीं बिलकुल सही दावा कर रखा है | क्यूंकि राम सेतु मनुष्य निर्मित है,और रामायण त्रेता युग का इतिहास !

इतिहास की परिभाषा शुरू से यही रही है कि वर्तमान समाज के हित को ध्यान मैं रख करतथ्यों की प्रस्तुति |इसका जीता जागता उद्धारण है कि एक ही इतिहास हिंदुस्तान,पाकिस्तान और बंगलादेश का है, लकिन तथ्यों की प्रस्तुति नेतीनो देशों मैं इसका स्वरुप अलग कर दिया है |

********************************************

THE answers here, are based on physical parameters, as they should be, as Ramayan and Mahabharat is history of HUMANS & Shri Ram and Shri Krishna are HUMAN REINCARNATION OF GOD.

REMEMBER: GOD is absolute and has absolute powers. HE can use those powers without taking the recourse of HUMAN AVATAR. HE comes as HUMAN to set examples. What examples HE will set if HE uses SUPERNATURAL or MIRACULOUS powers?

Remember an average Hindu cannot read and understand VEDAS and other RICH Hindu religious texts. But nevertheless Hindu Saints were great thinkers and ANTICIPATED the problem that the society would face.

They knew how serious the exploitation of weaker section of the society and females was, by religious Gurus, during PRE RAM ERA.

Similarly Mahabharat was the FIRST WORLD WAR, to determine the future of humanity. Whether humans would be farmed, cloned or BORN as humans as we know them now.