tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-866699657086285451.post5672292148752847159..comments2024-03-06T15:42:33.584+05:30Comments on AGNI PARIKSHA OF SITA: Pre Ram Era..Dharm used for exploitation of females..Ram ended thisAnonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01203074037723060879noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-866699657086285451.post-38799747599140773122010-09-08T14:47:18.348+05:302010-09-08T14:47:18.348+05:30The comment above assumes that anyone who wants to...The comment above assumes that anyone who wants to END Ram Bashing is non Hindu, out to destroy Hindu religion. The post Pre Ram Era..Dharm used for exploitation of females..Ram ended this was written to remove FALSIFICATION of events which is being done with Ramayan. <br /><br />Please note that no where I have said anything derogatory about Parashuram. Please CORRECT that.<br /><br />Ramayan and Mahabharat are History; let us have NO doubt about this. The only serious problems, that Hindu Dharmic Leaders or Gurus have created is they have not accepted this as History. The only thing that the Gurus were required to ensure was that NO SUPERNATURAL or MIRACULOUS powers were available to any of the characters of Ramayan or Mahabharat. Ramayan then becomes more credible and all the events would provide a Dharm. In any case if one believes in INCARNATION, one has to believe that every event in the history of Incarnated God (in this case Shri Ram and Mata Sita), would provide a Dharm.<br /><br />Now tell me how do an IGNORANT Hindu and Non Hindu support Ram Bashing?<br /><br />Answer is simple; and if you have read the above post as a Hindu, who wanted to end Ram Bashing, you would have immediately understood why Ram Bashing is going on and how it can end.<br /><br />REMEMBER:<br /><br />Ram bashing is possible only by FALSIFYING the events of Ramayan, and once you ensure that NO SUPERNATURAL or MIRACULOUS powers were available to any of the characters of Ramayan, you will find that atrocities on females were done by religious persons, and that is why Agni Pariksha of Sita , an highly explosive even became part of Ramayan. And that is why Shri Ram and Mata Sita established Agni Pariksha as an ADHARM.<br /><br />This is exactly what this post highlights.<br /><br />Now tell me who is a non Hindu.<br /><br />Please remove interpretation and interpolation, now, from Ramayan as they are no longer required. Secondly interpretation and interpolation FALSIFY the event so that Ram Bashing can continue. Once we stop falsification of event, we will easily be accepting that there was Dharmic exploitation of females during pre Ram era, which was corrected by Mata Sita and Shri Ram by establishing Agni Pariksha as an ADHARM. And this post provides at least eight such examples in the start itself, where falsification of events had led to Ram Bashing. How can a Hindu support Ram Bashing? <br /><br />To understand how falsification of event is done one may read the post : INTERPRETATION and INTERPOLATION in Ramayan .<br /><br />You can also read my post to understand fully how this was established as an ADHARM : AGNI PARIKSHA OF SITA ....FACTS post URL : http://awara32.blogspot.com/2009/02/agni-pariksha-of-sita-facts.htmlAnonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01203074037723060879noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-866699657086285451.post-91974559279543226212010-09-07T16:10:50.305+05:302010-09-07T16:10:50.305+05:30This article have many misinformation and insultin...This article have many misinformation and insulting to Hindu religion then for uplifting hindu religion. The references made in first part of article are baseless and were propagated by Muslims after arrival to India to deface Hindu religion. <br /><br />How can someone believe that beating a pregnant woman will lead to birth of deformed child. It will most probably lead to abortion. Birth of deformed child can only happen due to some disease. This whole story is cooked by Muslims to defame Hindu religion.<br /><br />If you don't believe in super natural power then how can you believe that Ahilya can end up having sex with Indra instead of Gautam by mistake? Can anybody believe that. If she did it because of lust then she should have been punished.<br /><br />All these stories of Brahaspati being a characterless person, Prasuram being a characterless person are propagated by Muslims to destroy Hindu religion because they themselves don't have history of good character people.<br /><br />Ram disowned Sita not because of physical evidence but to keep morality in Praja. One women in Ayodya had committed Adultery and she was not even afraid of taking her husband to king because her husband disowned her. It was concluded that women of Ayodya were taking Sita as wrong example and that example had to be removed even though Rama had no doubt about Sita's purity according to any evidence physical or devine.Jasvant Singhhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00758242354316631232noreply@blogger.com